Testimonials & Reviews
COR Healthcare Medical Associates
Cardiology, Interventional Cardiology & Electrophysiology located in Torrance, CA, Manhattan Beach, CA, San Pedro, CA, Redondo Beach, CA & El Segundo, CA
COR Healthcare Medical Associates always appreciates feedback from our valued patients. To date, we’re thrilled to have collected 2463 reviews with an average rating of 4.9 out of 5 stars. Please read what others are saying about COR Healthcare Medical Associates below, and as always, we would love to collect your feedback.
Michael S.
Submitted 11/08/23
very personable and explains everything
Harry E.
Submitted 11/08/23
Good
Benjamin P.
Submitted 11/08/23
Everything went well
Clint F.
Submitted 11/08/23
I usually always give 5 stars. People there are always very nice.. and I always feel the “personal touch” they’re striving for..
I enjoy seeing (and talking with) Dr. Matchison twice a year and never feel rushed.. he takes the time to hear me out and he answers all my questions clearly.
I was met this time with his nurse practitioner (a person I’ve never met before and has no idea of my history..). She answered all my questions with very complicated medical jargon.. and spent most of her time (what felt like) her trying to push me towards two new drugs.. (goodbye, “personal touch”).
Dr. Matchison did come in later and after he left, I recalled a question that I had forgotten to ask him.
The Nurse practitioner asked me what it was (as to not bother the doctor) and took charge of trying to answer it .. but she did not really answer it. I could tell she seemed bothered by the question she couldn’t answer, so I let it go. I suppose that’s my fault.. I should’ve written down my questions for Dr. Matchison.
Very sorry for the 4 stars.
Not my favorite visit.
Jerry S.
Submitted 11/08/23
Short wait, good visit with Kim,
Nuala B.
Submitted 11/07/23
Dr. Reddy listens attentively and invites questions from the patient. She phoned me after my appointment with valuable follow up. I found that a very caring gesture.
Bradley C.
Submitted 11/07/23
Arrived 10 minutes before scheduled appt and was greeted by very friendly and courteous receptionist and had only a minimal wait time before being called to the back . saw Dr Matchison, who is always concerned for our well-being. Thank you all. We hope to see you again next year!
Theresa B.
Submitted 11/07/23
Great time management!
Irene T.
Submitted 11/06/23
Very fast service. Doctor very kind and explain good.
Penelope V.
Submitted 11/04/23
Most grateful to Dr. Reddy and her staff for setting up a call with me yesterday. Tested positive again today :(
Eduardo A.
Submitted 11/03/23
Very knowledgeable and very helpful. Explained my options clearly about unblocking my LAD Artery
Alex T.
Submitted 11/03/23
Dr. Wyman is very conscientious and thorough with his examination during my follow-up visits.
Meihui L.
Submitted 11/02/23
Dr. Azam was very friendly and very thoughtfully to ask questions regarding my health symptoms and getting answers.
Margaret K.
Submitted 10/31/23
Very friendly, timely and efficient in seeing Margaret for her visit.
Cynthia C.
Submitted 10/26/23
Excellent
Jan E.
Submitted 10/26/23
Great listening and very knowledgeable doctor.
Gregory C.
Submitted 10/23/23
Good good
John M.
Submitted 10/21/23
I trust this man with my life.
He is straight forward, answers all questions carefully, acts to show genuine concern. I have recommended him to family and friends.
La Ronda J.
Submitted 10/20/23
Best Cardio Dr. Answers Every question, takes time to discuss everything.
Mark D.
Submitted 10/20/23
My experience was very good. Short wait, nice support staff, nice appointment with Dr. Matchison. He was friendly, patient, and answered my questions.
However, I am going to take this opportunity to try to clarify a couple of things about my procedure, if the Dr. is willing. I have read on the Net that there appears to be considerable controversy about the relative benefit of nuclear stress testing (the test the Dr. chose for me) and a coronary CT angiograms (CCTA). The majority opinion on the Net seems to be that CCTAs are currently regarded as the preferred test, giving better short term and long term benefits, and that they are replacing nuclear stress testing as the first line test for most patients, especially in Europe, but also here. This seems to have started based on a study performed around 2015, but I found nothing current to overturn this. Based on most of what I read, it seems that the CCTA can give more accurate results more quickly and with less radiation risk. Regards.